Marcos Peano

GKCompare →
League: Jupiler Pro LeagueTeam: RAAL La LouvièreNationality: Argentina
Positions:GKAge: ~28

Estimated market value (beta)

€0.2m€1.2m
Confidence: 37%
Valuation is computed by our proprietary formula, currently in development. Confidence denotes how sure we are of the estimate. Lower confidence widens the range.

Overview

ShotsecuritySpacecontrolMentalityDistributionComposureDecisionmaking
Overall x̄(w) = 51 / 100·Confidence 37%

Weighted average of attribute scores for this role, position-adjusted. Standout attributes count more than weaknesses.

Attributes (grouped)

Mental

Composure52

Shows reasonable calm under pressure typical of a regular starter. (conf 0.4)

Decision making50

Mostly sound choices on when to come for crosses or stay on his line. (conf 0.35)

Resilience

Injury reliability62

No significant injury history known, suggesting reasonable durability. (conf 0.35)

Outlook

Potential45

Mid-to-late twenties keeper likely near his career ceiling already. (conf 0.35)

Reputation30

Largely unknown outside Belgian second-tier and lower Argentine football circles. (conf 0.4)

Goalkeeper

Shot security52

Reasonably reliable handling for a Jupiler Pro League starting goalkeeper. (conf 0.4)

Space control50

Adequate command of his box against crosses at this level. (conf 0.35)

Mentality52

Shows steady temperament befitting a regular top-flight Belgian starter. (conf 0.35)

Distribution48

Functional but unremarkable distribution to initiate attacks. (conf 0.35)

Quick navigation

No roster-based suggestions yet.

Compare Marcos Peano with…

Scouting Report & Player Insights

Marcos Peano is an Argentine goalkeeper who has settled into Belgian football with RAAL La Louvière in the Jupiler Pro League. He is a relatively obscure figure internationally, with his profile built around steady shot-stopping and organizing his backline rather than any single standout trait. His numbers here reflect a plausible baseline for a regular starting goalkeeper at a mid-table Belgian top-flight club rather than detailed statistical evidence.

Comments